Mass spectrometry has long been a cornerstone in proteomics, primarily used for qualitative analysis to identify proteins and their post-translational modifications. However, as researchers sought to understand the dynamic behavior of entire proteomes in cells, tissues, or organisms, the need for quantitative methods became clear. Over time, advancements in instrumentation and technology have dramatically expanded the scope of proteomic studies. A decade ago, analyzing hundreds of proteins was considered a major achievement, but today, platforms like Shanghai Creation can analyze thousands, enabling a more comprehensive view of cellular processes.
While DNA chips are commonly used to study gene expression changes after disease onset, they do not always reflect protein-level differences. This is where mass spectrometry comes into play, often paired with two-dimensional electrophoresis. However, this approach is labor-intensive, has low throughput, and lacks reproducibility. To overcome these limitations, scientists developed quantitative proteomics techniques, such as SILAC (Stable Isotope Labeling by Amino Acids in Cell Culture), which allows for precise comparison of protein levels between samples.
Quantitative proteomics is typically divided into relative and absolute quantification. Relative methods, like SILAC, ICAT, and ICPL, compare protein abundance between samples, while absolute methods involve spiking unlabeled samples with known concentrations of isotopically labeled peptides. Although absolute quantification offers more precise data, it is less commonly used due to high costs and complex assay development. Among relative methods, SILAC stands out for its accuracy and efficiency.
SILAC was pioneered by Professor Matthias Mann at the University of Southern Denmark and later refined at the Max Planck Institute in Germany. The technique involves culturing two groups of cells in media containing either normal or stable isotope-labeled amino acids. After several cell divisions, the labeled amino acids are fully incorporated into the proteins, creating a detectable molecular weight difference. When mixed and analyzed via mass spectrometry, the ratio of light to heavy peptides reflects the relative abundance of the corresponding proteins.
One of the key advantages of SILAC is its high labeling efficiency—over 90% after 6-8 passages—and minimal bias from sample processing. It also requires small amounts of protein, typically tens of micrograms, making it ideal for detecting subtle changes in protein expression. However, challenges remain, such as potential metabolic conversions in some cell lines, which can complicate data interpretation.
In animal studies, SILAC has been successfully applied to mice, with researchers using isotopically labeled feed to label proteins across multiple generations. Similarly, nematode studies have shown that SILAC can be adapted for in vivo experiments, offering insights into stress responses and developmental processes.
To address the complexity of tissue samples, the Super-SILAC method was introduced, combining multiple labeled cell lines to serve as internal standards. This approach improves accuracy and broadens the applicability of quantitative proteomics in cancer research and beyond.
For researchers conducting SILAC experiments, tools like specialized media, dialyzed serum, and isotopically labeled amino acids are essential. Companies like Thermo Fisher Scientific offer a wide range of products tailored for SILAC workflows, supporting both basic and advanced applications. From culture media to mass spectrometry reagents, these resources enable precise and reliable proteomic analysis.
Soap is a widely accepted personal cleaning supplies, cleaning ability is strong, the price is cheaper, has become a necessity of people's life.But for different groups, the choice of soap is different.Soap makes a traditional washing product commonly used by each family, and soap is still a necessity for most people, usually solid, but also with plaster and liquid products. As people's living standards improve, they not only require the function of cleansing, but also to find some new work energy such as beauty, sterilization and deodorization.The function of plant soap is clean washing, which is of course to remove dirt, skin secretions, feces, chemicals, or bacteria, etc., and the cosmetics, maintenance products or drugs that remove skin surfaces are one of the main USES.
Bubble Bath Soap,Best Bar Soap,Foaming bath butter